Skip to content | Change text size

Table of Contents:

The Final Framework:

  

Framework References

  1. Bakker, A., Kent, P., Hoyles, C., & Bhinder, C. (2006). “It’s not just magic!” Learning opportunities with spreadsheets for the financial sector. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics. Retrieved December 11, 2006 from the World Wide Web: http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/IPs/ip26-1/BSRLM-IP-26-1-4.pdf
  2. Balacheff, N. (1993). Artificial intelligence and real teaching. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning from computers: Mathematics education and technology (pp. 131-158). Berlin : Springer Verlag.
  3. Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education, 24 (pp. 101-139). Washington , DC : The American Educational Research Association.
  4. Bellamy, R. K. E. (1996). Designing educational technology: Computer-mediated change. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 123-146). Cambridge , MA : The MIT Press.
  5. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev. ed.). Lanham , MD : Rowman & Littlefield.
  6. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  7. Bødker, S. (1996). Applying activity theory to video analysis: How to make sense of video data in Human-Computer Interaction. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 147-174). Cambridge , MA : The MIT Press.
  8. Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (with D’Ambrosio, U. & Skovsmose, O.). (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, visualization and experimentation. NY: Springer.
  9. Boreham, N. (2004). Orienting the work-based curriculum towards work process knowledge: A rationale and a German case study. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 209-227.
  10. Boud, D. & Prosser, M. (2002) Appraising new technologies for learning: A framework for development. Educational Media International, 39(3-4), 237-245.
  11. Bowers, C. A. (1988). The cultural dimensions of educational computing: Understanding the non-neutrality of technology. New York : Teachers College Press.
  12. Bryson, M., & De Castell, S. (1998). Telling tales out of school: Modernist, critical, and postmodern “true stories’ about educational computing. In H. Bromley & M. W. Apple (Eds.), Education/technology/power: Educational computing as a social practice (pp. 65-84). New York : State University of New York Press.
  13. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A., Jr, (1999). A post-technocratic policy perspective on new information and communication technologies for education. In J. Marshall & M. Peters (Eds.), Education policy (pp. 788-797). Northampton , MA : Edward Elgar.
  14. Christensen, J. R. (2002). Mathematical expectations of employees Retrieved August 9, 2002 , from the World Wide Web: http://www.stolaf.edu/other/extend/Articulation/christensen.html
  15. Coben, D. (2006/in press). What is specific about research in adult numeracy and mathematics education? Adults Learning Mathematics — An International Journal, 2(1), *
  16. Coben, D. (with Colwell, D., Macrae, S., Boaler, J., Brown, M., & Rhodes , V.). (2003). Adult numeracy: Review of research and related literature. London : National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy. Available as PDF from http://www.nrdc.org.uk
  17. Cohen, D. (Ed.) (1995). Crossroads in mathematics: Standards for introductory college mathematics before calculus. Memphis , TN : American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges [AMATYC].
  18. Colleran, N., O’Donoghue, J., & Murphy, E. (2001). An educational programme for enhancing adults’ quantitative problem solving and decision making. In G. E. FitzSimons, J. O’Donoghue & D. Coben, (Eds.), Adult and Life-long Education in Mathematics (Papers from Working Group for Action 6, 9th International Congress on Mathematical Education, ICME 9 (pp. 169-189). Melbourne : Language Australia in association with Adults Learning Mathematics – A Research Forum (ALM).
  19. Engelbrecht, J., & Harding, A. (2005a). Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the internet. Part 1: Technologies and taxonomy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 235-252.
  20. Engelbrecht, J., & Harding, A. (2005b). Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the internet. Part 2: Attributes and possibilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 253-276.
  21. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki : Orienta-Konsultit. Retrieved February 20, 2003 , from the World Wide Web: http://lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/Paper/Engeström/expanding/toc.htm
  22. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247-273.
  23. Ernest, P. (1998). Why teach mathematics? ¾ The justification problem in mathematics education. In J. H. Jensen, M. Niss, & T. Wedege (Eds.), Justification and enrolment problems in education involving mathematics or physics (pp. 33-55). Roskilde : Roskilde University Press.
  24. Ernest, P. (2002). Empowerment in mathematics education. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 15. Retrieved April 15, 2002 , from the World Wide Web: http://www.ex.ac.uk/~PErnest/pome15/empowerment.htm
  25. Evans, J. (2000). Adults’ mathematical thinking and emotions: A study of numerate practices. London : Routledge Falmer.
  26. Evans, J. & Wedege, T. (2004). Motivation and resistance to learning mathematics in a lifelong perspective. Paper presented at Topic Study Group 6: Adult and lifelong mathematics education, ICME 10. Retrieved June 6, 2005 , from the World Wide Web http://www.icme10.dk Programme — Topic Study Groups.
  27. FitzSimons, G. E. (2002). What counts as mathematics? Technologies of power in adult and vocational education. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  28. FitzSimons, G. E. (2004). An overview of adult and lifelong mathematics education. Keynote presentation at Topic Study Group 6, 10 th International Congress on Mathematics Education [ICME-10]. Available from the World Wide Web: http://www.icme10.dk
  29. FitzSimons, G. E. (2005a). Numeracy and Australian workplaces: Findings and implications. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 19(2), 27-40.
  30. FitzSimons, G. E. (2005b). Technology mediated post-compulsory mathematics: An activity theory approach. International Journal of Mathematical Education for Science and Technology,36(7), 769-777.
  31. FitzSimons, G. E. (2006a). An activity theory perspective on technology mediated mathematics education for undergraduates. Proceedings of the 3 rdInternational Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics at the undergraduate level [ICTM 3]. İstanbul: Turkish Mathematical Association/John Wiley. [Available on CD-ROM as Paper #220]
  32. FitzSimons, G. E. (2006b). Divergence and convergence in education and work: The case of mathematics and numeracy. VET & Culture conference 2006: Divergence and convergence in education and work. Retrieved August 9, 2006 from the World Wide Web: http://www.peda.net/veraja/uta/vetculture
  33. FitzSimons, G. E. (in press). Globalisation, technology, and the adult learner of mathematics. In B. Atweh et al, Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education. Book chapter accepted for publication Norwell , MA : Springer.
  34. FitzSimons, G. E. & Mlcek, S. (2004). Doing, thinking, teaching, and learning numeracy on the job: an activity approach to research into chemical spraying and handling. In J. Searle, C. McKavanagh, & D. Roebuck (Eds.), Doing thinking activity learning: Proceedings of the12th Annual International Conference on Post-Compulsory Education and Training (Vol. 1) (pp. 149-156). Brisbane : Australian Academic Press. see also:   http://www.ncver.edu.au/publications/1609.html
  35. Gal, I. , Tout, D., van Groenestijn, M., Schmitt, M. J., & Manly, M. (2001). Numeracy [working draft]. Retrieved 14 January, 2004 , from the World Wide Web: http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/ETS_Literacy/ALLS_NUMERACY.pdf
  36. Grace, A. P., & Gouthro, P. A. (2000). Using models of feminist pedagogies to think about issues and directions in graduate education for women students. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(1), 5-28.
  37. Griffiths, T., & Guile, D. (2003). A connective model of learning: The implications for work process knowledge. European Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 56-73.
  38. Groenestijn, M. van (2002). A gateway to numeracy. A study of numeracy in adult basic education. Utrecht : Utrecht CD b Press.
  39. Hasu, M. & Engeström, Y. (2000). Measurement in action: An activity-theoretical perspective on producer-user interaction. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53, 61-89. (Special issue on “Understanding Work and Designing Artifacts”).
  40. Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Oliver, R., Stoney, S., & Willis, J. (2001). Quality guidelines for online courses: The development of an instrument to audit online units. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 263-270). Melbourne : Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne .
  41. Hoyles, C., Wolf, A., Molyneux-Hodson, S., & Kent, P. (2002). Mathematical skills in the workplace. Final report to the Science, Technology and Mathematics Council. Foreword and executive summary. London : Institute of Education, University of London : Science, Technology and Mathematics Council. Retrieved April 5, 2006 , from the World Wide Web: http://www.ioe.ac.uk/tlrp/technomaths/skills2002
  42. Jacobs, K. L. (2005). Investigation of interactive online visual tools for the learning of mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(7), 761-768.
  43. Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M., & Hannum, W. H. with Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory. In D. H. Jonassen, M. Tessmer, & W. H. Hannum, Task analysis methods for instructional design (pp. 159-172). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  44. Kanes, C. (2003a). Developing numeracy. In J. Stevenson (Ed.), Developing vocational expertise: Principles and issues in vocational education (pp. 81-109). Sydney : Allen & Unwin.
  45. Kanes, C. (2003b). Strategies for developing flexible learning. In J. Stevenson (Ed.), Developing vocational expertise: Principles and issues in vocational education (pp. 203-225). Sydney : Allen & Unwin.
  46. Kaptelinin, V. (1996a). Activity theory: Implications for human-computer interaction. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 103-115). Cambridge , MA : The MIT Press.
  47. Kaptelinin, V. (1996b). Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 45-68). Cambridge , MA : The MIT Press.
  48. Kent , P., Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Guile, D. (2004). Techno-mathematical literacies in workplace activity. Paper presented at International Seminar on Learning and Technology at Work, Institute of Education , London , March, 2004. Retrieved November 24, 2004 , from the World Wide Web: http://www.ioe.ac.uk/tlrp/technomaths
  49. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge , MA : The MIT Press.
  50. Lagrange, J.-B., Artigue, M., Laborde, C., & Trouche, L. (2001). A meta study on IC technologies in education. Towards a multidimensional framework to tackle their integration into the teaching of mathematics. Available at http://www.maths.univ-rennes1.fr/~lagrange/cncre.rapport.htm Accessed August, 2001.
  51. Lindenskov, L. & Wedege, T. (2001). Numeracy as an analytical tool in mathematics education and research. Roskilde : Roskilde University , Centre for Research in Learning Mathematics.
  52. Lloyd, P. & Mikulecky, L. (1998). Numeracy in the workplace. A comparison of skill demands and skill levels. Available from ERIC online database, ED 431 107.
  53. Marshall, L., Northcote, M., & Lenoy, M. (2001). Design influences in the creation of an online mathematics unit for indigenous adults. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the crossroads. Proceedings of the 18 th annual conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 113-116). Melbourne : Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne .
  54. Matsushita, K. (1999). From monologic to dialogic learning: A case study of Japanese mathematics classrooms. In M. Hedegaard (Ed.), Learning in classrooms: A cultural-historical approach (pp. 211-225). Aarhus : Aarhus University Press.
  55. Mayer, E. (Chair). (1992). Report of the Committee to advise the Australian Education Council and Ministers of Vocational Education, Employment and Training on employment-related Key Competencies for post-compulsory education and training. Melbourne : Australian Education Council and Ministers of Vocational Education, Employment and Training.
  56. McLoughlin, C. (2001). Crossing boundaries: Curriculum and teaching implications of culturally inclusive online teaching. Paper presented at Australian Association for Research in Education conference, Fremantle , WA , 3-6 December. Retrieved September 5, 2002 , from the World Wide Web: http://www.aare.edu.au/01pap/mcl01720.htm
  57. National Board of Employment, Education and Training/Employment and Skills Council (1996). Education and technology convergence: A survey of technological infrastructure in education and the professional development and support of educators and trainers in information and communications technologies. Commissioned Report No. 43. Canberra : Australian Government Publishing Service.
  58. Nordkvelle, Y. (2004). Technology and didactics: Historical mediations of a relation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(4), 427-444.
  59. OECD (2003). The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework Mathematics, Reading , Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills . Retrieved October 17, 2006 , from: http://www.pisa.oecd.org/
  60. Olivero, F., John, P., & Sutherland, R. (2004). Seeing is believing: Using videopapers to transform teachers’ professional knowledge and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34 (2), 179-191.
  61. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). Cambridge , MA : Cambridge University Press.
  62. Roth, W.-M. & Lee, Y. J. (2004). Interpreting unfamiliar graphs: A generative activity theoretic model. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(2), 265-290.
  63. Selinger, M. (2004). Cultural and pedagogical implications of a global e-learning programme. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34 (2), 223-239.
  64. Sims, R., Dobbs, G., & Hand, T. (2001). Proactive evaluation: New perspectives for ensuring quality in online applications. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the crossroads. Proceedings of the 18 th annual conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 509-517). Melbourne : Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne .
  65. Skovsmose. O. (2000). Aporism and critical mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(1), 2-8.
  66. Slavit, D., & Yeidel, J. (1999). Using web-based materials in large-scale precalculus instruction. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4(1), 27-50.
  67. Smith, J. P., III. (1999). Preparing students for modern work: Lessons from automobile manufacturing. The Mathematics Teacher, 92(3), 254-258.
  68. Steen, L. A. (2001). Mathematics and numeracy: two literacies, one language. Singapore : The Mathematic Teacher. [Retrieved January 6, 2004 , from the World Wide Web: http://www.stolaf.edu/people/steen/Papers/twolits.html]
  69. Stevenson, J. (2003). Vocational teaching and learning in context. In J. Stevenson (Ed.), Developing vocational expertise: Principles and issues in vocational education (pp. 26-47). Sydney : Allen & Unwin.
  70. Stevenson, J. (2004). Developing technological knowledge.International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 5-19.
  71. Taylor, J. A. (2001). Affective research and the mathematics curriculum for distance and online education. In M. J. Schmitt & K. Safford-Ramus (Eds.), A conversation between researchers and practitioners. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of Adults Learning Mathematics — A Research Forum (pp. 50-53). Cambridge , MA : NCSALL, Harvard University , in association with ALM.
  72. Ten Dam, G., Volman, M., & Wardekker, W. (2004). Making sense through participation: Social differences in learning and identity development. In J. van der Linden & P. Renshaw (Eds.), Dialogic learning: Shifting perspectives to learning, instruction, and teaching (pp. 63-84). Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  73. Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematics Learning, 9(3), 281-307.
  74. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) & International Labour Organisation (ILO) (2002). Technical and vocational education and training for the twenty-first century: UNESCO and ILO recommendations. Paris : Author. [Available on PDF]
  75. Usher, R. (2002). Putting space back on the map: Globalisation, place and identity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 34(1), 41-55.
  76. Van Huizen, P., Van Oers, B., & Wubbels, T (2005). A Vygotskian perspective on teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3), 267-290.
  77. Wake, G., & Williams, J. (2001). Using college mathematics in understanding workplace practice: Summative report of research project funded by the Leverhulme Trust. Manchester : The University of Manchester . Available as PDF from http://www.education.man.ac.uk/lta/
  78. Wedege, T., & Evans, J. (2006). Adults’ resistance to learning in school versus adults’ competences in work: The case of mathematics. Adults Learning Mathematics — An International Journal, 1(2), 28-43.
  79. Weller, M. (2004). Learning objects and the e-learning cost dilemma. Open Learning, 19(3), 293-302.
  80. Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 51-85). New York : Cambridge University Press.
  81. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  82. Yasukawa, K., Johnston, B., & Yates, W. (1995). Numeracy as a critical constructivist awareness of Maths ¾ Case studies from Engineering and Adult Basic Education. In R. P. Hunting, G. E. FitzSimons, P. C. Clarkson, & A. J. Bishop (Eds.), Regional collaboration in mathematics education 1995 (pp. 815-825). Melbourne : Monash University .